PopUpCommontater . . ..seen but not herd

Instant retorts on current events, news, politics, you name it, I've got a comment.


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 May
2008 February
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August

My Links
Alternet
Ask a Question here
BRAD BLOG, The
CREW
C-SPAN
Full Frontal Scrutiny
Gun Toting Liberal, the
NewsTrust.net - Good Journalism
NewsTrust.net Blog
Poker Face
POGO
PopUpCommontater WP
SourceWatch
Sunlight Foundation
The Hill
The Metropolis Times

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Have a Question You Want Answered?
02.11.08 (3:37 am)   [edit]
I was just introduced to a website Unasked ( The Only Stupid Questions Are the Ones Left Unasked) while I was visiting Billy, the Blogging Poet .  Why not ask your most pressing questions on Unasked and see how your fellow Americans respond (and the rest of the world for that matter.  heh heh)
12 Comments
 
Election fraud ...surprise!
02.07.08 (3:32 am)   [edit]

 

California election fraud

California "provisional" ballot

Voting machine vote-rigging backdoor exposed

Hack a Diebold voting machine near you

.

"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." (Josef Stalin)

 

4 Comments
 
Judge and jury - who should they be?
02.07.08 (2:17 am)   [edit]
"The Sentencing Commission acted one day after the Supreme Court ruled that federal judges have discretion to hand down more lenient sentences for crack cocaine defendants than those recommended by federal sentencing guidelines."

The rest of the article can be read here . Now, here’s where I have a problem with the Machine. Who gets to be a criminal’s judge and jury? I’ve been taught that one who finds themselves on the wrong side of the law facing sentencing for their crime, is afforded the benefit of being judged in the perpetrator’s district and by a jury of their peers. In other words, by those who live in the community in which the criminal lives, judged by the community’s moral standard and residents, not by a distant entity of the Machine.

One of the problems we’re having in our society is a large segment of our people are addicts, not “criminals”; and these addictions can be to drugs, cigarettes, gambling, sex, umm, shoes, or whatever. Our prison system, fast becoming a cottage industry, has become recycling centers. The underlying problem is never addressed or corrected. Thus, an addict labeled as “criminal” is high-falutin’ poppycock. It guarantees recidivism for the untreated addict. Personally, I think people who “break laws” for certain behaviors should be treated for their addiction rather than caged. Because of my outlandish view, I have to believe that I’m the blessed vessel for common sense. (/sarcasm)

If we, as a nation, continue to pass ourselves off as a Christian nation of high morals and conservative compassion, we best learn what it entails to be a civil society, don’tcha think?


1 Comments
 
FISA role - would you like fries with that?
02.06.08 (12:32 am)   [edit]
I just learned the other day that the Heritage Foundation supports the unitary executive, a doctrine whose proponents argue the Constitution creates a “hierarchial, unified executive department under the direct control of the President,” so Congress is really Arm Candy to the Executive Bunch Branch. I come to this conclusion because I believe yesterday the VeePee more or less pleaded with the audience to go ply their influential clout to get a FISA bill passed that has the Prez’s approval. This would mean no accountability or investigation for the domestic warrantless surveillance program in place over the last several years. WOW. I don’t know what to say after learning this news, but I certainly won’t say, “Gee, sounds like someone wants to cover-up any wrong-doing by our most High Role Models!” I’m also not going to say, “After all, who in their right mind wants a “lessons learned” investigation in order to find out what went wrong regarding our guaranteed rights under our Constitution?”
Last but not least, I’m never going to say, “isn’t it obvious if we haven’t had another terrier attack in the US since 911 that what we’re doing about it right now is working!? “
Okay, all together now, “we don’t need no more stinkin’ laws which curtail our rights!”


1 Comments
 
Well, well, well.. look who's just popped in
02.05.08 (6:27 am)   [edit]

My dear Friends and Visitors,

Ta-DA!  T'is me, alright!  I'm popping back up here on tblog as it's come to my attention that some new things are a-happenin' here on tblog,, so as not to look like a complete stu-nod but rather an enlightened *sniff* bean counter.  *snort*

Yes, yesss.  I've been gone much too long!  Many, many walkabouts and muse-a-logs and pout-a-bouts after misadventures in MichiganSucks, too many to go into at the present time, so I beg your indulgence to ease back into my prior life here at tblog, after which I may begin a tear of attention-seeking missives about the misadventures of being a stunt man.  heh heh

I'm glad to be back..! 

PuC 

 

3 Comments
 
No Hillary Clinton Blog -  Blog on Hillary Clinton Corruption
Find Elected Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

See Issues & Action
Select An Issue Area:
CAissuewrite('large','dropdown');

Contact The Media
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

View top news